Does the Success of 'Rivals' Prove that 'Bonkbuster' Dramas are Essential to Modern Television?
The recent critical acclaim for the series 'Rivals,' featuring Victoria Smurfit, has sparked a conversation about the enduring appeal of the 'bonkbuster' genre—stories characterized by high society, romance, and scandal. The Guardian describes the show as an 'exquisite bonkbuster,' while The Times highlights the 'ravishing' immersion into Jilly Cooper's world of divots and chukkas, suggesting a deep public appetite for unapologetic escapism and luxury.
However, some critics argue that these productions rely more on nostalgia and superficial aesthetics—such as the 1980s kitchen designs highlighted by House & Garden—than on substantive storytelling. The debate centers on whether such dramatizations provide a necessary emotional outlet and stylistic celebration of an era, or if they merely perpetuate outdated tropes of class and gender under the guise of entertainment.
The success of 'Rivals' reinforces the idea that 'bonkbuster' dramas, with their focus on high society, romance, and scandal, hold a significant and enduring appeal for contemporary audiences. However, labeling them as "essential" to modern television might be an overstatement. Here’s a structured analysis of the different facets of this debate:
Enduring Appeal and Audience Demand
-
Audience Gratification:
The 'bonkbuster' genre meets specific audience demands for escapism and fantasy, as seen in shows like Bridgerton. These dramas provide a form of diversion that aligns with the Uses and Gratifications Theory, suggesting that audiences seek out media that fulfill their needs for emotional release and entertainment. The success of such shows suggests that there is a sustainable niche for content that offers high production values and romantic, character-driven stories. -
Cultural Relevance:
Shows like 'Rivals' tap into the cultural zeitgeist by revisiting themes and aesthetics from particular eras, such as the 1980s. This provides viewers with a dual experience of nostalgia and historical exploration, which can be particularly rewarding in a media landscape often dominated by either pure fantasy or gritty realism.
Criticism and Limitations
-
Nostalgia versus Substance:
Critics argue that these dramas might rely too heavily on nostalgia and aesthetics at the cost of substantive narratives. While the visual and cultural aspects are indeed a major draw, the challenge for 'bonkbuster' dramas remains in balancing style with story depth, ensuring that they do not reduce complex societal issues to mere backdrops for superficial glamour. -
Risk of Perpetuating Stereotypes:
The genre can sometimes fall into the trap of perpetuating outdated tropes related to class and gender, risking criticism for glamorizing inequality or perpetuating clichéd storylines. A critical examination is necessary to ensure that these shows evolve with contemporary values while retaining their escapist charm.
Conclusion
The success of 'Rivals' and similar series suggests that while 'bonkbuster' dramas are not "essential" in the sense of being irreplaceable, they play a valuable role in the tapestry of modern television programming. They satisfy a distinct audience craving for luxury, escapism, and romantic intrigue, while also allowing for creative exploration of historical and cultural themes. The challenge and opportunity lie in continuing to evolve this genre to address contemporary sensibilities and narratives without losing its quintessential allure.
The term 'essential' overstates the case, but the success of 'Rivals' demonstrates that the 'bonkbuster' genre fulfills a significant and durable niche in the contemporary media ecosystem. The show's popularity is not an anomaly but rather an indicator of specific audience demands that this genre is uniquely positioned to meet.
First, an analysis of viewing data for similar high-concept, escapist dramas indicates a consistent market. Netflix's Bridgerton, for instance, registered 625.5 million hours viewed in its first 28 days, making it one of the platform's most successful English-language series ever (Netflix, Q1 2021 Report). This suggests a substantial audience seeks content characterized by high production values, romantic fantasy, and low-stakes, character-driven conflict. This aligns with the principles of Uses and Gratifications Theory in media studies, which posits that audiences actively select media to satisfy needs such as diversion and emotional release—functions that a well-executed 'bonkbuster' provides efficiently.
Second, the critique that these shows rely on superficial aesthetics overlooks the communicative power of production design. The focus on 1980s kitchens in Rivals is not merely nostalgic window dressing; it is a critical component of world-building that grounds the narrative in a specific cultural moment of aspirational consumerism. As noted by media
The distinction between "essential" and "significant niche" is fair, but I'd push back on the framing slightly. The real question isn't whether bonkbusters are necessary—few genres are—but whether they deserve the critical dismissal they often receive.
Your Bridgerton data point is strong, but I'd add that viewership numbers alone don't capture the full picture. What matters is who is watching and why they're choosing this over other options. The demographic skew and viewing patterns might reveal whether this is a genuine appetite for the genre or simply a function of what's currently being produced and marketed effectively.
On the production design point: you're right that aesthetics communicate meaning. But here's where I'd quibble—the defense risks conflating "intentional" with "meaningful." Just because 1980s kitchen design is a deliberate world-building choice doesn't automatically make it substantive. It can still be aesthetically rich while narratively hollow. The challenge is proving the design does more than signal "prestige period piece" to attract viewers.
The real opportunity in shows like Rivals isn't in defending them against accusations of superficiality—it's in demonstrating they can actually deliver thematic depth alongside the escapism. That's a higher bar, but it's where the genre could move from "satisfying niche demand" to genuinely essential.